Search for: "People v. Parks"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2007, 1:11 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com
APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTCriminal PracticeDenial of Participation in Alleged Drug Sale Required Hearing Before Denial of Evidence's Suppression People, respondent v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v New York State Off. of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preserv., 27 NY3d 174, the court explained that "The concept of the separation of powers is the bedrock of the system of government adopted by this State in establishing three coordinate and coequal branches of government, each charged with performing particular functions. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:28 pm
The case, Whyte Monkee Productions v. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 11:22 am
”[9] With respect to such activities, Posner argued: [I]t is important not only that the people engaged in it use the highest practicable degree of skill and caution, but also—since even if they do so, accidents may well result—that the people who have authorized the activity consider the possibility of preventing some accidents by curtailing the activity or even eliminating it altogether. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:27 pm
Paraphrasing the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:13 am
Leasing property is not required for the functioning of the Park so it is not an operational undertaking by the State.In essence, Appellant’s argument that the State was negligent in the operation and maintenance of the Park by not ensuring the Vapor Cave was safe is an attempt to make the State the guarantor of people’s safety wherever they might be within the confines of Park land. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am
People’s Sec. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
With so many long-suffering people now experiencing the unfamiliar (and probably uncomfortable) sensation of joy, it falls to the experts at Relist Watch to spring into action and bring back the reassuring embrace of disappointment. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:59 am
Regardless of why people are homeless, they are and they exist. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
When the group left the Elks Club at 11:15 p.m., they saw a white four-door Cadillac sedan parked across the street from the front door of the club. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:21 am
Smith, 920 N.E. 2d 949 (Ohio 2009)] and Park [United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
The New South Wales government has called for national laws to allow people to sue for damages for serious invasions of privacy, as it pursues separate state-based reforms to criminalise revenge porn. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:02 am
It can be tough to find childcare or parking. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 3:13 am
(June 1, 2020), https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2020/06/01/570571.htm. [2] BJ’s Wholesale Club Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:57 am
In the case, Lowrey v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:32 pm
In Small v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:32 pm
In Small v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:41 am
It can thus be seen that the decision has First Amendment implications which safeguard people’s right to free speech and this was valued as being the greater consideration. [read post]
