Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2025, 12:30 pm
Dissent: "San Francisco's Superior Court abdicated judicial power. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:56 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:50 am
People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 1:53 pm
Superior Court of California (4/25/2017). [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:22 am
Mills v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:05 am
Sonoma County Superior Court Case No. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:13 am
The spouse must file a caveat or lawsuit in Superior Court. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:43 am
The court also held that the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) were met. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am
Lagleva, and Tara Evans, long-time Marin community members, in a lawsuit filed in Marin County Superior Court. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:26 am
In contrast, if a provincial superior court was deciding the issue, they tended to take a more restrictive approach. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
In contrast, if a provincial superior court was deciding the issue, they tended to take a more restrictive approach. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
On October 9, 2019 the Alaska Supreme Court heard arguments in Sinnok v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Prior to filing a case in the Suffolk Superior Court, which is the court of general jurisdiction for civil personal injury claims in Boston, the case must go before a medical malpractice tribunal. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 6:20 am
Prior to filing a case in the Suffolk Superior Court, which is the court of general jurisdiction for civil personal injury claims in Boston, the case must go before a medical malpractice tribunal. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The court’s ruling in Bourke v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In August last year, the Kerala High Court [Venu v. [read post]
