Search for: "People v. Superior Court"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2014, 9:57 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held in Verdugo v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:58 am
Valent v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 9:44 am
Snyder v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:13 am
The spouse must file a caveat or lawsuit in Superior Court. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 4:22 pm
Small, Judge of the Superior Court, LASC Probate Department. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Perhaps provinces should not be allowed to exclude people from superior courts unless the tribunals they establish as alternatives offer a reasonable modicum of access to justice. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In August last year, the Kerala High Court [Venu v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 5:43 am
The court also held that the predominance and superiority requirements of Rule 23(b)(3) were met. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The court’s ruling in Bourke v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:22 am
Mills v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am
Lagleva, and Tara Evans, long-time Marin community members, in a lawsuit filed in Marin County Superior Court. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:56 pm
People v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:50 am
People v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
In contrast, if a provincial superior court was deciding the issue, they tended to take a more restrictive approach. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:26 am
In contrast, if a provincial superior court was deciding the issue, they tended to take a more restrictive approach. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 8:05 am
Sonoma County Superior Court Case No. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:40 am
It is well-settled law that legislative enactments carry a strong presumption of constitutionality (People v Stuart, 100 NY2d 412, 422 [2003); People v Scott, 26 NY2d 286, 291 [1970)) Thus, a party seeking to find a statute unconstitutional bears a heavy burden and “must demonstrate, ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’, that the statute suffers from ‘wholesale constitutional impairment'” (People v… [read post]
