Search for: "Peoples v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 45,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2022, 1:17 pm
Dow has been quoted as stating that ‘She speaks the truth.'"You get why that seems qualitatively different, right? [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Which s/he does, reading the relevant CALCRIM instruction.And, of course, the relevant CALCRIM instruction accurately states the law. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:14 pm
An earlier published opinion (Bartholomew) held that there was no statutory right for the state to appeal when the trial court reduced a felony wobbler to a misdemeanor prior to trial. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Cheatham is entitled to double jeopardy protections -- not as a matter of constitutional law, but rather as a result of the part of the statute that says that in the relevant proceedings, "the person shall be entitled to the rights guaranteed under the federal and State Constitutions for criminal proceedings. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Page 567 658 N.Y.S.2d 567 172 Misc.2d 186 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:13 am
State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
Judge Leon notes that the Supreme Court took the Jones decision as an opportunity to revisit the Smith decision, because there was an earlier warrantless tracking device opinion, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 4:33 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 3:58 pm
This case is analogous to a Tenth Circuit decision from January finding no state action in blocking people from an account started during an initial campaign and... [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 11:00 pm
In short, while people live longer, they live a greater number of years burdened by disease. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:01 am
Nixon v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:20 pm
That states, in its entirety: "In my opinion the sentence imposed in this case is too harsh and I would not have imposed it were I the trial judge. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 11:07 am
In Fulton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:00 pm
I’m worried about the future of Roe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 12:01 am
United States, and in his dissent in Chew Heong v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:43 pm
Supreme Court held in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
