Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 1441 - 1460 of 4,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 11:08 am by Shari Shapiro
Making factually unsupported arguments may weaken the punch of the USGBC's clearer grounds for dismissal, and provide a toe hold for the Plaintiffs to plant seeds of doubt about the rest of the USGBC's arguments. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:38 am by Alyssa Rosen
Judge Janice Rogers Brown dissented from the ruling, arguing that FERC does not have the authority to take action to reduce the greenhouse gas impact of pipelines it approves, and thus is not obligated to analyze some impacts, stating “[t]he truth is that FERC has no control over whether the power plants that will emit these greenhouse gases will come into existence or remain in operation” (Sierra Club et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 9:38 am by lsammis
§ 893.117, both first degree misdemeanors.After the misdemeanor charges were filed, the State has only 90 days to bring the case to trial unless the defendant waives her rights to a speedy trial. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:53 am by mdkeenan
In People v Hutt, the defendant refused to let medical personnel draw his blood and refused to provide a urine sample despite a warrant authorizing these samples. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:29 am by Ronald Mann
On Wednesday morning, the Justices started with what might seem to be a minor tax case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:52 pm
--Fields v Rainbow Rehab Ctr, Inc, EDMich: Employer's motion for summary judgment GRANTED. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:32 pm by Maggie Macdonald
  (Notice of Denial at 19, fn.1.) [2] Draft Policy, Appendix A at 11. [3] Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:15 am
Case examples include an employee who used customer credit card information to go on elaborate spending sprees (United States v. [read post]