Search for: "Russell v. United States" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2010, 5:33 am by Howard Wasserman
United States (holding that the statute of limitations in the Court of Claims was mandatory and non-waivable, although avoiding the jurisdictional label) had retroactively recast Bowles as similarly non-jurisdictional. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:54 pm
tweetmeme_url = 'http://www.law.louisville.edu/cardinallawyer/node/233'; tweetmeme_service = 'bit.ly'; tweetmeme_source = 'chenx064'; The United States Supreme Court's blockbuster decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:36 am by Erin Miller
United States No. 08-103, Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Case in which the United States recently filed an amicus brief in response to the Court’s call for the views of the Solicitor General: Title: Missouri Gas Energy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Humanitarian Law Project and United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the United States, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal made the government’s position clear:  the City violated Title VII each time it made a hiring decision based on an improper classification. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:55 am by Erin Miller
United States (08-1301) — Ex Post Facto Clause application to sex offender registration law United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:00 am by Erin Miller
The United States filed an amicus brief in support of Lewis et al. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
  Breyer discussed Bush v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am by Gerard Magliocca
Const., art I, § 3, cl. 1 (“The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State . . . [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:43 am by Erin Miller
Castaneda (08-1529; 08-1547) – petitioner’s reply brief United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
According to the Heritage Foundation’s 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, Canada now enjoys a greater degree of economic freedom than the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 4:57 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Regulation is becoming an increasingly important factor for United States businesses. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am by Gary Nitzkin
So why did the United States Supreme Court accept this case for review? [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:18 am by Erin Miller
United States (09-367). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]