Search for: "Ruth"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 10,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented, contending that nowhere in the text of the ACA did Congress grant HRSA the authority to create exemptions from providing workers with contraceptive health care coverage. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 pm
She delivered a brief opening statement in which she talked about her background and her family and paid tribute to three former justices: Sandra Day O’Connor, the first women to serve on the court; Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died on Sept. 18 and whose seat Barrett is nominated to fill; and Antonin Scalia, whose judicial philosophy Barrett has described as her model. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:00 pm
Margaret Drew brings us this post by UMass Law student Sara Pierson I don’t remember the first time I heard Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s name. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:50 pm
When I was 21 years old and just beginning my career, Ruth Bader Ginsburg sat in the seat. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:01 pm
Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett declared Monday that Americans “deserve an independent Supreme Court that interprets our Constitution and laws as they are written," encapsulating her conservative approach to the law that has Republicans excited about the prospect of her taking the place of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsbur g before Election Day. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:00 pm
There’s one seat open from the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg…has yet to be filled, although the GOP is actively working on it as we speak. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am
But with the Sept. 18 death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court inevitably would be drawn into the political crossfire. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:05 am
The death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg reduces that number to six. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:34 am
About an hour after the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Senate minority leader and one of the largest consumers of microphones in New York, Chuck Schumer, threatened to “pack the court. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 3:45 am
Kamala Harris isn’t just a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which Republicans control and is rushing madly to ram through President Trump’s chosen replacement for the Supreme Court seat formerly held by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 11:54 am
The Supreme Court in a unanimous opinion written by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2011 in American Electric Power Co., Inc. v, Connecticut, held The Clean Air Act and EPA action the Act authorizes displace any federal common-law right to seek abatement of carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel fired power plants. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 7:35 am
Michael Luttig has an essay that begins, “For all political purposes, which is all that matters these precious few days before the election, it appears that the recent Rose Garden event to announce the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to succeed Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court could have been either the — or at least a — ‘super spreader’ of the deadly coronavirus that the president of the United States and an increasing number of… [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 7:35 am
By the same token, it's unlikely the Senate would have rushed to confirm Judge Amy Coney Barrett to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg under a presumptive schedule that allowed for more time. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 7:25 am
“Republicans have no standing to complain about court-packing”: Columnist Ruth Marcus has this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:00 am
This article is part of a symposium on the jurisprudence of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 10:36 am
“Court Packing Can Be an Instrument of Justice; If Republicans replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg with Amy Coney Barrett, they should pay a price”: Columnist Jamelle Bouie has this essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:12 am
The courage of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissenting words resonate: ‘I resist the conclusion that ‘nothing’ is the answer required in this case. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:12 am
The courage of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissenting words resonate: ‘I resist the conclusion that ‘nothing’ is the answer required in this case. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
The court has only eight justices following the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 8:21 pm
With only eight justices on the Court in the wake of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death, a 4-4 split would result in leaving the lower court decision in place, albeit without any binding Supreme Court precedent being created. [read post]
