Search for: "Snow v. Snow"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 11:50 am
A police officer's fall while chasing a suspect was not an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law Matter of Melendez v New York State Comptroller, 2008 NY Slip Op 06921, decided on September 18, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentRobert Melendez, a police officer serving with the Village of Freeport Police Department in Nassau County, was injured after tripping over a snow bank while chasing two suspects. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 12:32 pm
Meanwhile, on CNBC John Snow is comparing the U.S. economy to New England quarterback Tom Brady. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:25 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Atkinson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 11:08 pm
In Navajo Nation v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
That's right: 90 percent due to snow. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
That's right: 90 percent due to snow. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:00 pm
In Marchese v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:04 pm
Milliner v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
E. coli bacteria: what are they, where did they come from, and why are some so dangerous? [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:00 pm
In a good number of instances, a municipality will be liable to you for injuries you may sustain in a slip and fall on ice or snow on one of that town's sidewalks. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:25 am
The case is titled Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:47 am
Butte Environmental Council v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:34 pm
In Torress v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 10:04 pm
Okay, if you can't figure out what happens, go ahead and read the opinion.But as they say, in death penalty cases, neither snow, nor rain, nor sleet, nor the decisions of the California Supreme Court or district court below . . . . [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 6:22 pm
The question was certified: "Whether clean construction and demolition debris deposited onto the land for the purpose of providing the infrastructure for a recreational facility to be built at the site and to be used for snow skiing/snow boarding (facts which are undisputed for purposes of the August 4, 2007 partial summary judgment order) constitutes 'waste' under the Illinois Environmental Protection Act and requires a permit in compliance… [read post]
30 May 2008, 10:03 pm
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 3:03 pm
The property owners third partied the contractors in the underlying actions.RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:25 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:25 am
In McGrath, et al. v. [read post]
