Search for: "State of New York v. United States" Results 1441 - 1460 of 16,005
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am
Now the stuff of a bygone era.United States of America, Appellee, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Khal Bnei Torah of Mount Ivy, (SD NY, Jan. 3, 2024), a New York federal district court dismissed the portion of the lawsuit naming the United States as defendant. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Syndicate (United States District Court, Southern District of New York, March 29, 2010) This coverage action addressed the extent to which the insurer’s policy covers the insured’s investigation and defense costs involving a maritime accident and oil spill on the Mississippi River in July 2008. [read post]
16 May 2017, 5:42 pm by Steven Boutwell
By Lauren Rucinski On May 4, 2017, Momentive Performance Materials Silicones, LLC (“MPM”) agreed to a settlement with the United States, on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and the State of New York, that requires MPM to pay $1.5 million in fines. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
(decided on February 17, 2009, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 08 Civ. 323(PKC)). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 8:33 am
Many states, however, including New York, have arrived at conflicting results. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
CUOMO, Governor of the State of New York, by, virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the State of New York, do hereby order as follows:A. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am by Ronald Mann
The post Little guidance from court on New York interest requirement on national bank escrow accounts appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:56 pm
So good, in fact, that the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently certified that question to the New York Court of Appeals for resolution in a case entitled: Pachter v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Justice Viviano’s concurring and dissenting opinion explicitly calls for “adopting the approach to nondelegation advocated by Justice Gorsuch in Gundy v United States” (p 29 of his opinion). [read post]