Search for: "State v. Burns"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2012, 5:34 am
In State of Haryana v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 9:34 am
" The same sort of reasoning explains why a State may outlaw cross burning (and only cross burning) done with the intent to intimidate: "because burning a cross is a particularly virulent form of intimidation. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:20 am
Plaintiff further stated: “I damn you all to hell-may your bodies and souls burn in eternal fires” (id.). [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 2:42 pm
The Court of Appeals held (relying on Burns v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:52 am
In Walton v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976). [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
(yes, there is such a thing as 4th degree burns). [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 7:54 am
Johnson) or Shawn Eichman (the defendant in U.S. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am
The state also contended that the Supreme Court had said explicitly in a 1966 decision (Burns v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
Board of Education and Loving v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
That is what the Tyler Court of Appeals stated in 1975, in the case Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:14 am
Kohr’s lawsuit sparked comparison to the famous 1994 Liebeck v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Great Migration had produced important swing blocs of black voters in northern and border states who in 1930 shocked the nation with their demand that a nominee to the Supreme Court care about racial justice. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 8:30 am
Later, to complicate things, the Catholic Church tweaked the calendar again, baffling us and showing what can happen in church–state mashups. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
In Matter of Laidlaw Energy and Environmental Inc. v Town of Ellicottville, the court found that the conclusion contained in the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) findings that "serious increases in harmful emissions" from the plant would result in an "unacceptable adverse impact" was not arbitrary and should be upheld. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in Aruna Shanbaug v. [read post]
