Search for: "State v. Cornell"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 1:19 am
Federation of States Medical Boards of the United States Inc.U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a defendant's claim that the prosecution breached a plea agreement must be raised at trial in order to be reviewable on appeal, according to the plain-error standard under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure [Rule [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously Tuesday in Knowles v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
George's work in DC v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:02 pm
Medtronic, Supreme Court Decision, Cornell Law SchoolFood and Drug Administration In Orange County, California, our defective medical device attorneys have represented products liability clients with complex cases in Southern California and throughout the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:13 am
On Monday the Supreme Court issued its decision in Vaden v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:57 am
The Court ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Bartlett v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Tushnet, Mark V., 1945- TITLE The constitution of the United States of America : a contextual analysis / Mark Tushnet. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:31 am
Levine [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the drug labeling requirements under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) [text] do not preempt state products liability laws. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:38 pm
Arthur Anderson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 6:04 am
The Court ruled 7-2 in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 10:26 pm
In Rivera v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
Just this week, a state supreme court ruled against a man who underwent surgery to take out his Medtronic defibrillator because there was a chance the device device's battery could fail. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
Just this week, a state supreme court ruled against a man who underwent surgery to take out his Medtronic defibrillator because there was a chance the device device's battery could fail. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Co. v Pace Plumbing Corp., 298 AD2d 146, 147; Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v United States Fid. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 12:42 pm
The Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School -- which previews U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
In Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:15 am
[Roberts], 66 NY2d 516.Posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us]* State law may provide that certain employees of a private entity are eligible for membership in a public retirement system such as the employees at the statutory contract colleges at Cornell and Alfred Universities pursuant to RSSL Section 40.2(a). [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:30 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:08 am
The Court ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 in Herring v. [read post]
