Search for: "State v. David" Results 1441 - 1460 of 12,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
These rights will “beat the air” when the UK leaves the EU but they cannot lawfully be defeated by the exercise of the royal prerogative. 14:35: Scoffield QC begins with issue 1 – the Northern Ireland Act 1998 is not neutral to the issue of whether an act of Parliament is needed before the government can give notice under Art 50 TEU. 14:33: David Scoffield QC takes the floor on behalf of Agnew and others – individuals and human rights organisations who are concerned… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Rule in Clibbery v Allan In a sense, the case of Clibbery v Allan [2002] EWCA Civ 45, [200] Fam 261, [2002] 2 WLR 1511, [2002] 1 FLR 565 confirms my point; and it represents the common – (judge-made) – law, which cannot be overturned by a rule-maker. [read post]
14 May 2008, 2:12 pm
  This could be a wacky case like Adlerstein v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm by familoo
Friend and I have asked David Norgrove to build on his preliminary work in this area to undertake a comprehensive review of the family justice system. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:11 am
" Kappos further stated that "first-action allowance is up something like 600%" under this pilot program. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:18 am by Meg Martin
The Court stated that the five-step process outlined in Tingler and adopted in Osborn v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 11:01 am
State is a Sept. 24, 2007 COA opinion (see ILB entry here) re sentencing. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Dr David Rolph lectures in media law at the University of Sydney Law School. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 6:25 am by Bill Otis
 The column, by David Rivkin (a friend of mine) and Prof. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]