Search for: "State v. I. A. A." Results 1441 - 1460 of 84,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
   I want to respond here to two points made by Paul, both of which I regard as highly creative, which in this context means that they are clever but really have no relationship to reality.First, Colorado v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 11:02 am by Florian Mueller
Google case over Google's search engine practices is pending in the District of Columbia.United States et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:52 am
I spent the end of last week at the University if Missouri-Columbia, attending a great conference organized by Peggy McGuinness, on the (in)famous case of Missouri v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:24 pm by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court of Appeals heard oral arguments today in Caperton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:37 am by Steven G. Pearl
The Supreme Court of the United States this morning granted Wal-Mart's petition for certiorari in Dukes v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
I'm not one of those people who believe that the federal government was behind 9/11 or that the "deep state" (and/or Illuminati) controls the nation, but I do believe that the government substantially oversteps at times. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:12 pm by Walter Olson
I explain at Cato at Liberty (& Damon Root, Reason). [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 10:08 am
Today, the Maryland Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the case of Ehrlich v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 12:59 pm
The Ninth Circuit's published "opinion" today is indeed brief, and states in its entirety:"In light of Kernan v. [read post]