Search for: "State v. Items of Property" Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
As a matter of EU law, the CJEU in SABAM v Scarlet has stated that intellectual property rights are neither inviolable nor must be absolutely protected, but must be balanced against other fundamental rights including freedom of expression.Ashby on its facts was an obvious interference with the photographers’ Article 10 rights, even if the ECtHR was unable to find the interference disproportionate. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
K&J were required to pay the landlord's costs on an indemnity basis subject to the exclusion of one item. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am by Francis Davey
K&J were required to pay the landlord's costs on an indemnity basis subject to the exclusion of one item. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
In this sense, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) published in June 2022 the practical approach taken for classification purposes (see IPKat post here). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:41 pm by Shannon O'Hare
The technology is therefore particularly suited to collectors’ items that derive their value from scarcity and authenticity. 2. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:17 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Join us back here tomorrow for a preview of the argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]