Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Rev. 97 (April 2009) Jacob R Karabell, The implementation of "Balanced Diversity" Through the Class Action Fairness Act, 84 N.Y.U.L. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Rev. 97 (April 2009) Jacob R Karabell, The implementation of "Balanced Diversity" Through the Class Action Fairness Act, 84 N.Y.U.L. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
This includes coverage of the law school's recent seminar, chaired by Sir Robin Jacob, on the controversial ECJ rulings in FA Premier League v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 7:32 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
Ethernet Innovations v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 2:26 pm
Jacobs, No. 142519, and vacated its June 22, 2011 order. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:57 am
" Rebecca has more on this case, which reminded me a little of the classic Jacob & Young v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:33 am
United States v. al Kassar, No. 09-1051-cr (2d Cir. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 3:30 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Next week’s topics will be: Florence v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:41 am
Justice Kagan questioned whether the state court opinions had failed to follow Mathis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:21 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:28 am
See, e.g., Jacobs v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
“Life and Character of Jacob Broom,” Historical and Biographical Papers of the State of Delaware, v. 5 (1909) Drescher, Nuala M. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 4:03 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am
She stated that in February 2010 Ms. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
We need to dismantle this Unjust system city by city, state by state and country by country. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:44 am
He recently dismissed the suit against them, which was pending in New York state court, with prejudice, which means he cannot sue them again for the comments that were the subject of that lawsuit. [read post]
