Search for: "State v. Jim " Results 1441 - 1460 of 2,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am by Dan Stein
Coverage of the Court continues to focus on the fallout from its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Daniel Nazer
Adding to the strangeness of today’s ruling, the same three-judge panel simultaneously issued an excellent free speech decision in Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 12:07 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
A three-judge panel for The Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas last week ruled that a trial court erred in denying a local television news station the use of the state's anti-SLAPP ("Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation") law as a defense in a defamation claim by the founder of a school for special needs students.Justice Jim Sharp wrote the 21-page opinion in KTRK Television, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:21 am by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
In an earlier post I quoted Justice Sotomayor’s statement (concurring in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:14 am by Jack Chin
 In Alabama and other former Jim Crow states, prohibitions on integration and interracial marriage have gradually been removed from the books (but Mississippi Code Ann. 37-7-329 is a nice exception). [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:14 am by Jack Chin
 In Alabama and other former Jim Crow states, prohibitions on integration and interracial marriage have gradually been removed from the books (but Mississippi Code Ann. 37-7-329 is a nice exception). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Mark Graber
  We celebrate Brown and regard the dead or dottering persons responsible for the destruction of Jim Crow as heroes. [read post]