Search for: "State v. M. C. M." Results 1441 - 1460 of 6,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm by Brian Shiffrin
While the NYSBA states that the initial eligibility determinations shall be decided by the court (see id. standard C-3 at 6), they also declare that the "[p]rovision of counsel shall not be delayed while a person's eligibility...is being determined or verified" (id. standard C-5). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:58 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
A copy of the decision can be found here Paul Steck and Joanna Roberto http://www.goldbergsegalla.com/attorneys/paul-c-steck http://www.goldbergsegalla.com/attorneys/joanna-m-roberto [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
The second part of the judgment then focused on whether such violation was justified by the unique qualities of the property in question, the peculiarities of its discovery, or the Italian State’s interest in preserving the integrity of its cultural patrimony. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:10 am by Russ Bensing
That’s similar to the argument being made in State v. [read post]