Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 11,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2012, 11:38 am
The Court of Appeal therefore unanimously allowed the appeal and found that the US insolvency proceedings were to be held as “foreign main proceedings”. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
Hewitt, 329 U.S. 249, 252-53 (1946)) or “No State has the right to lay a tax on interstate commerce in any form” (Leloup v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:00 am
State of Minnesota, Court of Appeals: Minnesota v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 5:13 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Feder v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:33 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In today’s United States v. [read post]
In challenge to Indian Child Welfare Act, court will weigh the rights of states and the role of race
8 Nov 2022, 11:56 am
There are four main issues at the heart of the dispute. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:00 am
Overview There are two main methods by which a U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:14 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlLa Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the La Posta Reservation v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:38 am
Rares J delivered his judgment last week: Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v National Rugby League Investments Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 34 . [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:25 pm
Baker and Mathew (Tribal Jurisdiction; Younger Abstention Doctrine) United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Since Maine v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 6:19 pm
In New York State Department of Correctional Services v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
I blogged here about United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm
Supreme Court decision of Anderson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Under the circumstances of the main proceedings that effect is to be presumed unless the offer concerns a single item or few items offered by a seller clearly not acting in the course of trade [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
That said, I suspect that lots of state prosecutors ought to share the local DA's concern that this ruling in Miller v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:38 am
That said, I suspect that lots of state prosecutors ought to share the local DA's concern that this ruling in Miller v. [read post]
