Search for: "State v. Martin"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 4,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2012, 4:08 am
As the Court of Appeals indicated in New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 14 NY3d 275, termination from the position because the individual does not possess a valid required license or certification is not a disciplinary termination. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
., Forthcoming).From SSRN (Abortion and Reproductive Rights):Martin E. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:39 pm
Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 3:08 pm
”***Remember United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
Martin, 09-996). [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
On 8 October 2021, His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting as a Judge of the High Court) handed down his decision in an action brought by Royalty Pharma Collection Trust (“Royalty Pharma”) for approximately €23 million in royalty payments from Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH (“Boehringer”) (Royalty Pharma Collection Trust v Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH [2021] EWHC 2692 (Pat)). [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:11 pm
Only days after issuing the Hamrick opinion, the Eleventh Circuit was again confronted with questions surrounding the FAA Section 1 exemption, in Martins v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:03 am
Martin 19-605Issue: Whether, when a jury expressly states it is “unable to agree” on a defendant’s guilt for a greater offense and convicts the defendant of a lesser offense, and the defendant successfully appeals his conviction, the hung-jury rule permits retrial of the greater offense or Green v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:47 pm
Martin Kulldorff, Jim Hoft, Dr. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 9:52 am
David Boyer, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Jerry Lee Chambers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:41 pm
(stating that “speculation does not meet the evidential requirements which would . . . defeat a summary judgment motion”), certif. granted, 183 N.J. 592 (2005), appeal dismissed Jan. 3, 2006; Martin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:30 am
State, 576 So.2d 1310 (Fla. 1991); State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:41 am
The Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Nashville filed its written opinion on Renken v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:50 am
appeared first on Martin Heller Potempa & Sheppard, PLLC. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:49 pm
That’s the question that the Illinois Supreme Court answered in People v Martin, No. 109102, 2011 WL 1499909 (Ill Sup Ct).From People v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:43 am
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 10:57 am
Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:52 pm
Case: Olive v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 pm
To my mind, the latter practice is at odds with longstanding Supreme Court precedent on the supremacy of federal courts in interpreting federal law, such as Martin v. [read post]
