Search for: "State v. Master"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2017, 6:54 am
" See Vertical Leisure Ltd v Poleplus Ltd [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC) at 66.As the Master identified, one of the difficulties that claimant(s) in IP claims commonly face is that they have no direct knowledge of the circumstances in which the infringing acts occurred and the individuals directly involved in them. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
I end up mostly rejecting “The master’s tools will never end up dismantling the master’s house” because it’s not very easy to dismantle the master’s house without them.Buccafusco: maybe differently useful/harmful in different contexts? [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Part V discusses the original approach to delinquency in the schools: “zero tolerance” policies. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
Part V discusses the original approach to delinquency in the schools: “zero tolerance” policies. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:42 am
" The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:30 am
One case in particular, Sagonowsky v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:30 am
All state laws vary. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
In a very recent Delaware Supreme Court decision, Dieckman v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:46 pm
In Dieckman v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:04 am
ACP Master Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:00 am
If the Judiciary Act of 1789 and related legislation better explain the establishment and development of judicial review in the United States than Marbury v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:01 am
This masterful and riveting non-fiction book is about one of the bravest men in the history of this country, who died on this day in history. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
” That is, it is judges themselves who have recognized, over the past seventy-five years or so since the seminal case of Crowell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm
Section V: Retention An IC element may retain raw SIGINT for up to five years “after the information is first collected by NSA,” unless continued retention (for up to another five years) is approved in writing by the IC head. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
United States, 16-309). [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
SRM Global Master Fund Limited Partnership v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
Comm’r, 136 T.C. 373 (2011)—one of the cases leading up to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
Argument preview: What level of educational benefit is “appropriate” for children with disabilities?
4 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
In 1982, the Supreme Court ruled in Board of Education v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 1:19 am
El Paso Pipeline GP Company, LLC v Brinckerhoff, No. 103, 2016 [Del. [read post]
