Search for: "Stephens v. State Bar" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm by UChicagoLaw
  And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 10:12 pm
The 1980s and the Contract Argument                 In the 1980s, several legal challenges were brought against overdraft fees as the advent of debit cards made the fees much more economically relevant. [19] The legal arguments turned on points of contract law, with the opponents of overdraft fees claiming that the fees were either unconscionable, unenforceable, or punitive and therefore barred by contract law.… [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Mary L. Dudziak
”Justice Stephen Breyer referred to the global attention given to Brown in his dissent in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by Erin Miller
” Justice Stephen Breyer referred to the global attention given to Brown in his dissent in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin's thoughtful presentations might have received more recognition in previous years, but the bar is so high. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Kevin's thoughtful presentations might have received more recognition in previous years, but the bar is so high. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 5:45 pm by cdw
Bell (a decision that federal habeas review of a criminal conviction is not barred when a state court had declined to review the merits of a case on the ground that it had done so previously). [read post]