Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
Hayes v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
Shire U.S., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:38 am
[www.nylj.com]
Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted:
APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTLandlord/Tenant LawUnder Lease Permitting 'Fast Food Cooking' in Bar Tenant Has Right to Install Exhaust Vent, Fan, Ductwork Second on Second Cafà © Inc., plaintiff-respondent v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:52 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 6:25 am
But despite that change, in a 2003 decision, in a case known as Colonnade Management v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:21 am
New York State Senate Minority [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
Woods NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law Landlord Provides Documentary Evidence Tenant Did Not Primarily Reside in Subject Residence Wah Kok Realty Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
Gallagher KINGS COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law Tenant Denied Dismissal of Predicate Notice To Terminate Tenancy by Landlord for His Own Use Kurpiewski v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:21 am
New York State Senate Minority [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:14 am
United States [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 12:25 pm
In Nash v. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 4:16 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:51 pm
This is less of a problem now though, after the Spencer v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:12 pm
B. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:37 am
This was part of a scheme of renovation and improvement of a three storey office building (which had been occupied by tenants as a single office suite) with a view to making it more adaptable for use as either three separate suites of offices or as a single suite in order to attract replacement tenants. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
The article discussed, amongst other things, disreputable landlords making a profit from low income tenants. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 12:12 pm
Ahmed v Shah, Bradford County Court. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 1:18 am
Case Name: Coffinberry v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 3:18 am
In support, defendants rely on Section 30.01 of the lease which states “[p]rovided that Tenant is not in material default beyond any applicable grace period … at the time of the exercise of this option to purchase, the Landlord grants to the Tenant … at any time during the last year of the term of this lease, the right to purchase the entire Premises leased hereunder. [read post]
