Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Kennedy"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2010, 5:19 pm
William Rehnquist (appointed by Nixon) and Byron White (appointed by Kennedy) are the only dissenters. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:04 pm
Darby, and Wickard v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Kennedy [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:57 pm
The Court of Appeals has addressed whether someone is registerable both via Article 78 and direct appeal (North v Board, 8 NY3d 735 [2007]; People v Kennedy, 7 NY3d 87 [2006]). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 11:04 am
To suss out who those people were out of the 26,000 people I was following, I needed some help…” Above The Law The Group Blog v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:29 pm
Kennedy asked near the end of the hourlong arguments. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:40 am
Justice Kennedy, joined by Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Rehnquist, dissented. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
In Snyder v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
Second, the Court’s ruling treated Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 3:43 am
Which is why I raised an eyebrow after reading Justice Kennedy's question in Arizona v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 2:35 pm
Justice Kennedy, who Kavanaugh replaced, was not a major fan of Mapp v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am
[Phase 1 began with South Bay v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
” Wyoming v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm
Kennedy. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:09 pm
Indeed, I think Texas v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:27 am
They did so because - as Justice Kennedy observed, using the evocative language of equal protection -- the Supreme Court's decision in Bowers v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
For in Miller v. [read post]
Argument analysis: Justices seem primed to find constitutional limits on the detention of immigrants
4 Oct 2017, 9:44 am
Knauff v. [read post]
