Search for: "US v. David Paul" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,757
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2009, 10:16 am
Related posts: ACLU Should Be Hit With Rule 11 SanctionsIn the ACLU v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
Booker in 2005 ([origin.www.supremecourtus.gov]) and Cunningham v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:41 pm by WSLL
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Justin A. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
Since the use of derivatives for speculation generally leads to a different outcome from the use of derivatives to hedge, the duty of directors to consider the use of derivatives should be limited only to the hedging alternative. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
By December 2008, Newsweek reported that the size of the market amounted to US$600 trillion[v], an exponential increase when compared with the size the market had in 1993 and 2006. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:53 am
Kerin, Appellate Counsel; and David E. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
Sep 24, 2009) (NO. 1055, 4481N/07)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Paul Wiener of counsel) for appellant. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: $388 million verdict against Microsoft overturned (Ars Technica) (IP Law Observer) Briefs filed at US Supreme Court in Bilski v. [read post]
ROBERT SCOTT, HONORABLECOMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, THORNTON KEEL, DONNA KEEL, MICHAEL HELLRUNG, DONNA HELLRUNG, WILLIAM PASCHALL, DAVID WOMACK, NATALIE KLOSS, DARRYL HUBBELL AND AMY HUBBELL; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00576-CV, 275 SW3d 558, 11-14-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009)09-0138CITY OF AUSTIN, ET AL. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 2:47 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Jenny L. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Andover, MA; Paul Domigan, President) Bonfire Company Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 1:51 pm
”   While there is no indication that their bargaining power was in any way abused in this case, prosecutors nonetheless can use this power, along with their charging discretion, to silence all the people “aggrieved” by wiretapping.Lawyers: David McCraw and Itai Maytal of The New York Times Company; AUSAs Daniel Stein and Jesse Furman; James Brochin, Marc Falcone and Michelle Hirshman of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (Elliot… [read post]