Search for: "United States v. Craft" Results 1441 - 1460 of 1,899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2009, 1:28 am
Int'l Trade Comm'n changed the accepted wisdom regarding the commission's power to issue broad injunctive relief excluding infringing articles from importation into the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
“This case,” the judge wrote, “is yet the latest chapter in the judiciary’s continuing challenge to balance the national security interests of the United States with the individual liberties of our citizens. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 1:01 am by Josh Blackman
As the Chief Justice recently said in response to threatening statements made by a United States Senator about Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, such statements "are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 1:26 pm by Tom Parker
Since 1783 there has only been one standard in the United States for incarceration and that is conviction in a court of law. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:27 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
In the federal system, imposition of a sentence within the guidelines range was mandatory until the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:10 pm by Wells Bennett
All this rings hollow to Mizer, who intones: this isn’t about whether citizens of the United States can be executed. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:27 pm by Ruth O'Meara-Costello
In the federal system, imposition of a sentence within the guidelines range was mandatory until the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:17 am by The Charge
  A case titled Escobedo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:11 am by Joy Waltemath
Turning first to the Seventh Amendment, which provides that “[i]n Suits at common law, . . . the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law,” the court pointed out that because both the employee’s state law claims were legal in nature, and he made a timely jury demand on those claims, he was entitled to have them… [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 5:19 am by Phil Dixon
The story notes that this is the 30th mass killing in the United States in 2024. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:09 am by Zachary Price
(For example, I argued beforehand that the court would be wrong to rule as it did in Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:10 am by SHG
  Congress did not make the reduction retroactive, while asserting that the change was needed because the law was patently unfair.As Judge Evans explained in his decision for a unanimous 7th Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]