Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 1441 - 1460 of 40,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
United States, No. 08-728, to address a question that has divided the courts of appeals regarding the operation of the Speedy Trial Act. 1. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Doe, 642 F.3d 1112 (2011) [concurring opinion]United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 12:47 pm by adminssean
The United States Supreme Court extended the right to confront witnesses to the laboratory technicians who examine and test physical evidence that is offered to prove guilt. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 The question here was how the “first sale doctrine” should apply to materials that were made and legally acquired abroad, and then imported to the United States--because importation generally is not allowed except by authority of the owner of the copyright.In an opinion delivered by Justice Breyer, the Court held by a vote of 6-3 that the “first-sale” doctrine does apply to copies of a copyrighted work lawfully made abroad. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 The question here was how the “first sale doctrine” should apply to materials that were made and legally acquired abroad, and then imported to the United States--because importation generally is not allowed except by authority of the owner of the copyright.In an opinion delivered by Justice Breyer, the Court held by a vote of 6-3 that the “first-sale” doctrine does apply to copies of a copyrighted work lawfully made abroad. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:59 am
State and its companion cases, the Indiana Supreme Court disposed of several cases that all asked the same question: does the United States Supreme Court's 2004 holding in Blakely v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
This question is at the core of the case of Sufi and Elmi v United Kingdom, in which the Strasbourg Court has ruled that the state of chaos prevailing in Somalia is so dire that repatriation there would amount to a breach of the prohibition on torture and inhuman treatment under Article 3. [read post]