Search for: "Walker v. State"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 2,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
Walker, 435 S.W.3d 789, 791 (Tex. 2014) (holding that a suit “against any individual employee” is a suit against the employee in his individual capacity, i.e. one that “seek[s] personal liability”). [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 2:26 pm
In making this finding, Judge Robinson reiterated her position in Walker Digital, LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:30 am
In December 1970, the Court split 5-to-4 in the case of Oregon v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:11 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 6:19 am
The Court of Appeals (Jacobs, Walker and Leval) reverses. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:28 am
Kische USA LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:48 am
" The case, EME Homer City Generation v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:48 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Hugo Medina v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:00 am
Tennessee State University, No. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses “law and symbolism” at the Court and argues that the “majority got it right” with its ruling last week in Walker v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
It is theoretically possible that the SCOTUS could draw nourishment from Ottawa to fatten up Chevron step two, in the same way that Justice Kagan rescued Auer deference from the hangman’s noose by giving it a highly contextual and reasoned structure in Kisor v Wilkie (see also the discussion of Chevron’s footnote 11 in the amicus brief of Professors Barnett and Walker). [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 12:10 pm
Sutcliffe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Walker, 2009 U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Chris Walker had the great idea to assemble a bibliography on the major questions doctrine (MQD) so that we can have a one-stop shop for all things MQD. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:54 pm
Both cases are before Northern District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker, who is also presiding over the much-watched Al-Haramain v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:28 am
Gallop v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Lords Brown, Dyson, Walker and Kerr agreed. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Walker v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Walker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
