Search for: "Washington v. Roberts"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 4,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2019, 3:46 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes looks at the “blockbuster question” the Supreme Court will consider “at the start of its new term: Is it legal to fire someone for being gay or transgender? [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:51 am
The court is hearing the case of McCoy v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 7:53 am
Robert Chesney provided us with another Apple v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Brownstein, Town of Greece v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:41 am
An op-ed in Tuesday's Washington Post criticizes the Supreme Court's decision last week to deny certiorari in Virginia v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:05 am
Many conservatives [worry about John Roberts because of] the Obamacare decision... [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that Benisek and another partisan-gerrymandering case challenging Republican-drawn maps in Wisconsin that was argued in October, Gill v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:03 am
In Washington, lying no longer registers as an offense against the rule of law. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
[vi]And then-Justice Rehnquist might have joined the majority in Washington v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 am
V. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 2:22 pm
Elms v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:03 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the 2019 winner of the Berggruen Prize for Culture and Philosophy, a $1 million award given annually to a ‘thinker whose ideas are shaping human self-understanding to advance humankind. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:54 am
The first is Apple v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Buckley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am
Owens, and Jesinoski v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am
” Other coverage comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Even so, a motivated group of conservative justices could decide to engage in naked partisan politics in that case, which would (among other things) allow Chief Justice Roberts to rehabilitate himself in conservatives’ eyes, after his vote to uphold the ACA in the 2012 NFIB v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am
The first is in Rodriguez v. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 1:21 pm
Helms and Tennessee v. [read post]
