Search for: "Wells v. Hand"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 18,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2016, 2:41 pm
The Delaware Court of Chancery recently selected lead counsel and lead plaintiffs based in response to competing motions in connection with class action stockholder litigation, applying the well-worn principles in Hirt v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 1:27 am
"If you read his opinion [in Lawrence v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
In Denis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
The much anticipated judgment of Kogan v Martin [2019] EWCA Civ 1645 was recently handed down by the Court of Appeal (CA) which revisits the thorny issue of joint authorship of copyright works. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 9:51 pm
(Cruz v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:01 pm
How well does the "invisible hand" work in this area? [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:37 pm
But, the issue at hand was the freedom to marry. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:34 pm
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeal's recent decision in Guranovich v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:30 am
Yes, says Potts v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:19 pm
The case is Miller v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
Curll, Stowe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am
Metromedia, Inc. (1971), adopting that same standard in defamation cases, as well as the Court’s (and White’s) ultimate rejection of it in Gertz v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 3:48 am
The Court of Appeal found that the Judge should have instead reviewed the broadcast in the light of the knowledge of the claimant companies which a hypothetical viewer acquainted with those companies would possess (adopting the test derived from Knupffer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
John Schedin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 10:54 am
The new approach offers ability to bet on the occurrence of “natural 0” hands as well as other potential side bets. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 1:04 pm
"Well, that's not good. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:06 pm
If we really had a rule that treated seriously the Ninth Circuit's principle about trees (or receipts) falling in the forest where no one hears (or steals) them, I think we might well have to strike down a plethora of federal and state statutes that we're super happy with and that we commonly think reflect legitimate interests. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
As well as the resulting deals.But when we write opinions, we should deal with the hard stuff. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
Together with this, the test laid down by Laws LJ in R(Wood) v Commissioner of the Metropolis provides a firm guiding hand to this notoriously difficult balancing act: First, the alleged threat or assault to the individual’s personal autonomy must (if article 8 is to be engaged) attain ‘a certain level of seriousness’. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:20 am
The Story of Wetzel v Lambert The case of Wetzel v Lambert was decided by the U.S. [read post]
