Search for: "White v. Florida"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 1,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
If, after all, one accepts that there are genuine elements of truth in the “1619” argument that American politics cannot be understood without paying full attention to the relentless efforts of the white majority to maintain white supremacy, then majoritarian democracy loses some of its charm. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
If an Article Five amendment were required for such a modest measure, this would set a precedent requiring similar Article Five treatment for more ambitious federal interventions – thereby condemning these measures to defeat by Southern and border states, which would predictably refuse to give them the backing needed to gain the necessary approval by three-fourths of the states.This was precisely what made Twenty-four so attractive to its leading sponsor -- the racist Senator Spessard Holland… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
” Apparently, the two ultimate triggers were the failure of the president’s litigation in Pennsylvania and the certification of Michigan’s votes—but even before those two events, Murphy had informed the White House that she would be starting the transition on Nov. 23. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
A growing global problem is the so-called illicit whites or cheap whites. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
Bennett, et al. (10-238) and McComish, et al., v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:22 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
On Dec. 17 and Dec. 19, 2019, and Jan. 8 of this year, speaking from the Senate floor, Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made the case that the Trump impeachment was setting a “toxic” and “nightmarish” precedent “deeply damaging to the institutions of American government. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
The year prior, an avowed white supremacist gunned down nine parishioners in a church in Charleston, South Carolina. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:07 pm
Its is also clear that the management of public opinion on both sides of the Florida Straits are becoming more difficult. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Rubio has said that he would appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
I submitted to the SEC yesterday a comment letter on behalf of a bi-partisan group of eighty professors of law, business, economics, or finance in favor of facilitating shareholder director nominations. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
They would thus have the power—and the very strong incentive—to vote as a bloc to strip a legitimate win from the Democratic President-elect and award the White House to their own nominee.Would they do so? [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Things are becoming ever more fraught, and it is neither too early nor too late to reassess the pros and cons of the present strategy.But even if the White House decides to stick this out, the President will still be able to do the right thing by paying the country’s bills in full and on time, which will require him finally to say without qualifications that the debt ceiling law must give way to the Constitution. [read post]
