Search for: "Williams v. Federal District Court"
Results 1441 - 1460
of 3,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2010, 7:52 pm
Please note that there are several trial court & district court decisions not listed below that should be in this week’s mailer. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
Both cases were removed to federal district court and consolidated for trial. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” In District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 am
Williams v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:57 am
District Court for the Western District of Texas: U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
On May 11, 2015, SLS removed the case to federal district court. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
Justice Neil Gorsuch filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of cert, arguing that the court’s 1970 decision in Williams v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:24 am
The Court’s decision, in Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Samsung last year (Judge William H. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 12:36 pm
Because the panel does not read Title VII to fulfill that promise, Irespectfully dissent.The 2-1 decision is authored by District Judge Jose Martinez and joined by William Pryor (who also writes a concurring opinion). [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:32 am
Circuit kept afloat Moore's retaliation case, sending it back to Washington's federal district court for a trial on the merits. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:12 pm
A self-insured employer (Kinetic Co.) had standing to sue a medical device manufacturer (Medtronic, Inc.) under Minnesota false advertising, deceptive practices, and consumer fraud laws, the federal district court in Minneapolis has ruled. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:41 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:54 am
The U.S. district court will hold a trial in December, and the purpose of the injunction is to bar Huawei from leveraging two Chinese patent injunctions (granted by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court) before Judge Orrick has the chance to adjudicate a related claim.Like in the court below, Quinn Emanuel, as counsel for Samsung, is defending the Microsoft v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
In the New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on recent criticism of the Court (as well as the federal judiciary more generally) by Republican presidential candidates. [read post]
