Search for: "1-8 Doe" Results 1461 - 1480 of 32,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In fact, the only reason for not attending was given in its letter dated 8 January 2010 which states that “... the applicant does not consider it beneficial to attend the forthcoming OPs. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In an 81 ruling, the court said the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal was right to conclude that the man was fired for breaching the company’s drug policy, not because of his addiction. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
(Price, J.) (8:1:0) Gobert was arrested for a parole violation for assault. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:49 pm by Mari Cheney
Motions for orders to show cause in Districts 5, 6, 7 and 8 will be determined by a judge. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am by Diane Tweedlie
Admissibility of the appeal1.1 In a situation such as the present case in which the request filed in the appeal proceedings does not expressly identify the subject of the appeal and the extent to which the decision is to be amended, as required by Rule 99(1)(c),(2) EPC, the latter can be ascertained from the appellant's overall submissions (see T 727/91, Reasons 1; T 273/92, Reasons 1).1.2 On the one hand, the appellant stated in its notice of appeal that it… [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am by Diane Tweedlie
Admissibility of the appeal1.1 In a situation such as the present case in which the request filed in the appeal proceedings does not expressly identify the subject of the appeal and the extent to which the decision is to be amended, as required by Rule 99(1)(c),(2) EPC, the latter can be ascertained from the appellant's overall submissions (see T 727/91, Reasons 1; T 273/92, Reasons 1).1.2 On the one hand, the appellant stated in its notice of appeal that it… [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:56 am by Graham Smith
Q.1 How many new powers does the IPAct introduce: (a) None (b) One (c) Six (d) More than six? [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
Suitability for Gun Permit and Summary of Substitute Senate Bill 967 - 2011-R-0149You asked for a summary of (1) the law governing the issuance of temporary gun permits and (2) substitute Senate Bill 967, which the Public Safety Committee reported to the floor on March 8. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:52 am
Suitability for Gun Permit and Summary of Substitute Senate Bill 967 - 2011-R-0149You asked for a summary of (1) the law governing the issuance of temporary gun permits and (2) substitute Senate Bill 967, which the Public Safety Committee reported to the floor on March 8. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:20 am
This is so as the wording of Sections 8(2) and 8(4) of the Act does not expressly provide for such power. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:54 am by Douglas Reiser
Valiant Insurance & Northern Insurance, Division 1, Apr. 12, 2010, Case No# 63692-8 involves a suit between between two insurers of a single construction company. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:25 am by Drew Falkenstein
The list of recalled products does not include products intended for infants (i.e. under the age of one). [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Id. at *8 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).Additional Substantve Limitations Fail to Sufficiently Narrow the Claim[1] "Cyberfone asserts that the method of claim 1 requires a 'telephone,' and that it is a specific machine that plays an integral role in the method. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am
Question #7 – Consular Processing How does Consular Processing work? [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Question #7 – Consular Processing How does Consular Processing work? [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:56 pm by Jeremy
The questions asked here are these: 1(a) If anyone other than the copyright holder refers by means of a hyperlink on a website controlled by him to a website which is managed by a third party and is accessible to the general internet public, on which the work has been made available without the consent of the rightholder, does that constitute a ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29? [read post]