Search for: "Alabama v. United States"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 2,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 2:47 pm
Here is a summary of the article: In the 1950s and 1960s, the southern [United] states struggled to respond to the civil rights decisions being issued by the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the highlight of the week on the oral argument front: United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
John Mikhail, Georgetown Law, has a post up on Balkinization entitled A Reality Check on "Officers of the United States" at the Founding, in which he draws upon the research he conducted on the phrase in connection with his study of the Necessary and Proper Clause. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:54 am
The entire regulatory process of the United States government is about to get upended. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition of the United States Brief in opposition of respondents Thompson et al. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
United States, 914 A.2d 1 (D.C. 2006) (discussed here), which analyzes blank">Crawford v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Since that time almost every major military ally of the United States has revised its policy to allow openly-gay service members, but the political will to change the policy in this country has been lacking. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
(I covered one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
My father, who was black, was a career enlisted soldier in the United States Army and is a decorated veteran of both Korea and Vietnam. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:18 pm
The compromise was that the federal courts could effectively overturn a state judgment on a ground decided by the state courts if that decision was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
§ 145 encompasses the personnel expenses the United States Patent and Trademark Office incurs when its employees, including attorneys, defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 1:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 1:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm
Alabama,” THEM Felix Rocha v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
Twenty-four State Attorneys General signed an Amicus Brief in support of Arizona, as did the United States. [read post]
