Search for: "B. v. S." Results 1461 - 1480 of 52,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2009, 4:35 pm by Tom Casagrande
In a decision with potentially important procedural ramifications, the 6th Circuit today affirmed the rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of a trademark infringement complaint for failure to state a claim.In Hensley Mfg., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:25 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The “proper purpose” rule in the Companies Act 2006, s 171(b) – a director must “only exercise powers for the purposes for which they are conferred” applied to the provision in the respondent company’s articles (article 42, empowering the board to impose such restrictions where a statutory disclosure notice had not been complied with). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
We have another A and B situation today, but this time it's not Anheuser-Busch and Budvar. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:54 am by John L. Welch
Athletics Investment Group LLC d/b/a The Oakland Athletics Baseball Company v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am by Russ Bensing
As the 8th District’s decision a couple weeks ago in State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 7:58 am
In a decision yesterday, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's decision denying a motion to set aside a judgment under Rule 60(b)(3) on charges of fraud. [read post]