Search for: "BAKER V. STATE" Results 1461 - 1480 of 3,489
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm by The Law Office of John Guidry II
  Let’s take a look at some questionable trial practices, as found in the case of Baker v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The latter would certainly raise justiciability concerns under the framework set forth by Baker v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
  That turned up cases applying the same rationale under federal law:  Baker v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Every other state supreme court to consider such a claim has rejected it, as Justice Baker described in her dissent. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
  Stewart Baker sat down with Alan Rozenshtein and Adam Candeub for a deep dive of the NetChoice v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:01 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Reflecting on the Supreme Court’s April 24 decision in Jesner v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am by Lev Sugarman
Rachael Hanna recapped last week’s proceedings in the United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 8:28 am by Garrett Hinck
The Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm by John A. Emmons
  Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s decision in Egbert v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 8:14 pm by J. Gordon Hylton
More than five decades ago, the “one-person, one-vote” rulings of the Warren Court, especially Baker v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
As a preliminary matter, the court concluded that each of the plaintiffs had standing as to at least one defendant, and the court declined to view Baker v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]