Search for: "Born v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 4,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2011, 1:51 am
BM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 366 (05 April 2011) - Read judgment Another control order has been ruled unlawful and quashed by the court of appeal, on the basis that the evidence relied upon to impose it was “too vague and speculative”. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 6:11 am
That broad consensus is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Newspaper Printing Corporation, [147 S.W.2d 406 (Tenn. 1941)] (holding that it was not libelous to state that the plaintiff had opposed a job application because the applicant was a foreign-born Jew). [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:12 am
" And it minced no word for the government, either: "At best, State's efforts to pass off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The first is Secretary of State for Health and Ors v Servier Laboratories and Ors. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:56 am
Saigon had just fallen,” and over half of all of the Americans alive today had not yet been born. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:35 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 11:00 pm
In 1966 in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
This title phrase, glommed from the non-precedential decision of the Third Circuit in State Troopers v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:29 am
Over at VC, Eugene Volokh posts about the Iowa Supreme Court's decision in State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:07 am
., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
A’s wife & daughter had come from Ghana to join A in the UK in the UK in 2009, whereas K (who was seven years old at the time of A’s application and had a different birth mother) had been born in the UK and was therefore a British Citizen. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
A’s wife & daughter had come from Ghana to join A in the UK in the UK in 2009, whereas K (who was seven years old at the time of A’s application and had a different birth mother) had been born in the UK and was therefore a British Citizen. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 11:00 am
McLean v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:12 pm
The GOP would, like the Dred Scott court, answer in the negative. to wit, the GOP would have it that the status of the parents of a person born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction is determinative of whether someone born in the United States could be a citizen. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:13 am
Grisolia v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:51 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:32 am
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
(Eugene Volokh) Last week’s State v. [read post]
