Search for: "Brown v. United States"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 4,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
For example, the court in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:27 am
The court heard oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:29 pm
Supp. 2d 109, 115 (D.D.C. 2004) (citing United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:05 pm
In its 2011 AEP v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:00 am
United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm
California v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the most interested questioner on whether the presidency was an "Office under the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 11:19 am
Seamus Hughes and Bennett Clifford detailed how the capture of Soulay Noah Su, a 16-year-old United States citizen ostensibly fighting for the Islamic State in Syria, represents a departure from the norms that apply to most foreign-born ISIS fighters. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:10 am
Third, more policy focus should be placed on integration—a goal that has largely been abandoned since the last concerted efforts to enforce Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:27 pm
AT&T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:42 am
In Brown v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:42 am
In Brown v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 6:23 am
United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976) and its progeny, the defendants seek to stay this action pending the resolution of a related proceeding in New York state court. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:02 am
Co. of State of Pa., 251 F.R.D. 520 (S.D. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:55 am
Here is the latest crop:In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
