Search for: "COOPER v. LONG" Results 1461 - 1480 of 3,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am by Hannah Kris
United States in the Trump v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:03 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Quinta Jurecic
Andrew Kent examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Hernandez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 6:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
Casey, and Whole Woman's Health, but that so long as those cases were not overruled, he's going to follow stare decisis on smaller points. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:10 am
Del Corso, BestWater (Order) and of course GSM v Samona (2016).Prof. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:17 am by Jon L. Gelman
Judges of Compensation will need to review each factual situation on a case-by-case basis to determine the prohibitions and entitlements of the DME so that the power balance is equalized in this pre-trial discovery procedure.DiFIORE v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “A “witness at a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding enjoys an absolute privilege with respect to his or her testimony,” as long as the statements made are material to the issues to be resolved therein (Pfeiffer v Hoffman, 251 AD2d 94, 95 [1998]; accord Martinson v Blau, 292 AD2d 234, 235 [2002]; see Youmans v Smith, 153 NY 214, 219 [1897]; Wilson v Erra, 94 AD3d 756, 756-757 [2012]). [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Facts The Fuks case began nearly three long decades ago with a complaint by Mali Fuks (“Fuks”) alleging direct and derivative claims against Ruth Shamron (“Shamron”) over Shamron’s alleged seizure of control of R&L Realty Associates (the “Partnership”), an entity formed to sponsor the conversion of a Manhattan residential apartment building into a cooperative. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
On Friday, I wrote about an amicus brief, for me and 54 other antitrust and competition policy scholars, that I wrote in Teladoc v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The city adopted an ordinance regulating the establishment and regulation of medical marijuana cooperatives within the city, finding the ordinance was not a “project” under CEQA, because it will not result in a direct or reason [read post]