Search for: "California Employment Law Letter" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
” Twenty state attorneys general sent a letter to the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 7:55 pm by John Elwood
City of Stockton, California, is an employment-law case, but one with pronounced implications for the free exercise clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 8:36 am by Eric Goldman
Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:01 am by Ross Runkel
Ross Runkel is editor of Employment Law Memo at LawMemo, Inc., in Portland, Oregon. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:36 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 7:11 am by Phil Dixon
The business had a policy that made all employees subject to drug testing and stated that offers of employment depended on passing a drug screen. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm by Nabil Shaikh
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) proposed a rule to ban non-compete clauses in employment contracts. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:26 am by Steve Hall
California has the nation's largest death row, with 708 condemned inmates. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
If the voters tried to change the law, they really would have changed nothing. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:47 am by Skylar Hunter
This article, written by RPLG Founding Partner Jon Holtzman, was originally published in the January 17, 2022 edition of the California Employment Law Letter. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
Court Upholds Contempt Sentence for Poison-Pen Letter Writer New Jersey Law Journal A gadfly known for suing judges, police and other officials could spend six months in jail for venting his ire at the city of Paterson, N.J.'s corporation counsel. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
Uber Technologies; the plaintiffs in that case challenged only Uber’s misleading representations to the public suggesting that price of rides include gratuity.[26]  In a complex decision, the Northern District of California dismissed for failure to show necessary elements of a contract law claim and failure to sho [read post]