Search for: "California v. Scott" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
Starbucks - tip pooling case continues in trial - Los Angeles lawyer Anthony Zaller of Van Vleck Turner & Zaller in the firm's California Labor & Employment Defense Blog Chancery declines to enforce settlement agreement among rich and famous - Wilmington attorney Francis G.X. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
d never really heard of this Southern California lawyer before, perhaps because his law partner, Gloria Allred, seems to always put herself out in front of the high profile legal case du jour (see the Scott Peterson trial, the Gwen Araujo trial, the Scott Dyleski trial ??? [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:40 am
The California Supreme Court announced today that on Monday, March 3, 2008, it will issue an opinion in Jones (Scott) v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:28 pm
He is a member of the bar in California, Washington, D.C. and Pennsylvania. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 5:04 pm
Scott echoes my sentiments about an ABA measure calling for prosecutorial ethics. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 7:24 pm
Acknowledging the importance of federal FLSA regulations in the analysis of the exempt duties under California law, the court had no trouble upholding the trial court's determination that Combs spent over 50% of his time on exempt, administrative duties, and that he had therequisite discretion and independent judgment.The case is Combs v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
New Cingular Wireless Servs., Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (2007), the Ninth Circuit held that a mandatory arbitration clause with a class action waiver was unconscionable under California law, and also that the FAA did not preempt California law on the issue. [read post]