Search for: "Carter v. May" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
  In particular, they focus on the contention that a simple majority initiative may not be used to overrule an equal protection decision by the Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:37 am by Amy Howe
He told Phillips that he wasn’t convinced that the court’s 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm by Steve Bainbridge
4) The Rosenbergs (19)--good3) Franklin Delano Roosevelt (21)--give him some credit for managing the winning coalition in WW II2) Barack Obama (23)--way too high, even if socialized medicine ends up being his legacy1) Jimmy Carter (25)-- being feckless and sanctimonious doesn't make him a bad guyAll in all, I have to agree with Jim Geraghty that:I’m no fan of most of the Democrats on the list, and there are some good picks. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:03 am by Melina Padron
In the courts: The Queen v Stephen Carter David Beswick Linda Mary Boyd Michael Gillespie-Doyle ??? [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:20 pm
.________ (prov. de Parme) et l'autre à V.________ (prov. de Latina). [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
Wednesday, that will come to be known by the first case of the two: FERC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 9:18 am
The panel also ruled that an improper motive for a challenge by one attorney out of several in a multi-defendant case can be enough to violate the principle of Batson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
HHJ Birss QC took the opportunity of the question session to explain that in certain cases, where the parties agree, he may be prepared to give preliminary views on the case during a Case Management Conference and/or deal with cases on paper (as was done in Hoffmann v DARE). [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
  The problem may be how, in legal terms, the Court might fashion a ruling with that result — and nothing more — in the case of FCC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:46 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
[In a brief per curiam opinion, the Fifth Circuit concludes the plaintiff states lack standing to press their claims. ] Last month, in Louisiana v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
Judge Birss took the opportunity of the question session to explain that in certain cases, where the parties agree, he may be prepared to give preliminary views on the case during a Case Management Conference and/or deal with cases on paper (as was done in Hoffmann v DARE). [read post]