Search for: "Court of Appeals, 5th District"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 5,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2019, 4:48 am
Justice DeWine has recused himself from the case, and Judge Jennifer Hensal of the Ninth District Court of Appeals will sit for him. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Courts of Appeals for the 3rd, 5th and 7th Circuits—that under Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
In a 38-page opinion filed on May 16, and belatedly ordered published on June 14, 2019, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment rejecting all of plaintiff/appellant Center for Biological Diversity’s (“CBD”) CEQA and statutory challenges to the EIR that the California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (“DOGGR”) was required by S.B. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:09 pm
A Tennessee District Court recently ruled in Wachter Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
In this case, the district court followed the 5th Circuit’s approach, but the U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:39 am
United States, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that for the results of a scientific test to be admissible, the test “must be sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs[1]. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
TrademarkUse of the Term/Mark “Engineer”State Regulation of the TermFirst Amendment’s Commercial SpeechDisclaimerAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.E. raises only its constitutional claim on appeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
Waite of the Seventh District Court of Appeals sat for Justice Fischer, who has recused himself from the case. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, and back again. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Moss appealed the District Court’s decision. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:54 am
The Florida First District Court of Appeals granted a writ of prohibition and reversed an order denying judicial disqualification A party may move to disqualify a trial judge when the "party fears that he or she will not receive a... [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit requiring a contemporaneous objection. [read post]
30 May 2019, 5:54 am
The district court for Douglas County affirmed the decision of the Board, and the Brunings appealed. [read post]
29 May 2019, 1:45 pm
Indeed, the lower court initially greenlighted Toups case before being reversed on appeal on Section 230 grounds. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:19 am
When the case went back to the 5th Circuit, the court of appeals ruled that the family cannot rely on Bivens v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 1:59 pm
An interview from the California Appellate Court Legacy Project is here.Also of note, Self-Help Resources Expand to Courts of Appeal: California's 5th District Court of Appeal launched a new online Appellate Self-Help Resource Center for self-represented litigants and lawyers who seek help with the appeals process.In The Recorder, see Judicial Realism is DangerousIn the May 20 DJ don't miss, Of Two… [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held in Hernandez that a Bivens remedy should not be extended to a claim arising from an injury to a foreign citizen in foreign territory. [read post]
