Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am by Amy Howe
” At CityLab, Kriston Capps links the Court’s upcoming decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
The new requirement will not apply to business entities subject to regulation by the California Department of Insurance in California, or that is in the business of insurance in any other state. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 12:52 pm by Stephen Rosenberg
McQuillin v Hartford Life holds that a disability insurer should be held to the strict letter of the Department of Labor’s claim handling regulations, and deemed to have forfeited its right to insist on completion of its own internal review prior to being sued if it failed to fully complete its review and issue a final decision within the time period set by the regulations. [read post]
Circuit invalidated that rule on procedural grounds in 2014, holding in Allina Health Services v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:40 am by Jeralyn
Manning is accused of leaking the State Department cables to Wikileaks. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
In 2003, the Court decided the case, American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is,” Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
The bailout bill added the following to Section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1823(c)) [the bolded language is the most relevant here]: (11) UNENFORCEABILITY OF CERTAIN AGREEMENTS. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by velvel
In the fourth of the cases, Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 5:18 am
I still give copies of the decision to new associates as a primer on no-fault.In other news, Fair Price Medical Supply Corp., a/a/o Nivelo v Travelers is still in the briefing stage before the Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]