Search for: "Does 1-96" Results 1461 - 1480 of 2,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 7:15 pm
Two days after the US Senate votes 92 to 2 to take up a measure that would ban Congressional members from engaging in insider trading, the legislation has passed by a 96 to 3 vote. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Such a retroactive identification may also obviate the need for a formal authorisation (see also T 850/96 [3.3]). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
Mendoza, 722 F.2d 96, 97 n.1 (5th Cir. 1983).7 We agree with the majority of the Courts of Appeals that have addressed this issue and find that by failing to raise the issue of standing in the Superior Court, the People have waived the issue on appeal. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 2:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Consequently, the doctrine of continuous representation does not apply, and Supreme Court erred in denying the motion (see Gotay v Brietbart, 12 NY3d 894; see generally Young v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The decision does not exceed the margin of discretion conferred to the President of the EPO in application of R 152(1). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:04 am by Brad Pauley
   As it does every year, the report underscores how rarely the Court grants review. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:57 am by Michael C. Smith
  ALU has not shown why such a description is so deficient that it does not serve the notice role of infringement contentions. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
The fact that "one does not have to follow guidance" is true in a literal sense. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:44 pm
If however, you request a urine test but the officer does not suspect drugs being involved, the officer can refuse to allow the urine test and require you to take the blood or breath. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:32 pm by Adam Zimmerman
  The GCCF does not require that claimants prove BP is liable, only their individual damages. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm by Steven G. Pearl
  Second, the CROA's non-waiver language ("Any waiver by any consumer of any protection provided by or any right of the consumer under this subchapter—(1) shall be treated as void; and (2) may not be enforced by any Federal or State court or any other person") does not prohibit the waiver of one's right to proceed in court because, again, the CROA "does not create a right to initial judicial enforcement. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:48 am by Lawrence Solum
Neomi Rao (George Mason University School of Law) has posted Public Choice and International Law Compliance: The Executive Branch is a 'They,' Not an 'It'(Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 194-277, November 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
The applicant filed an appeal against the decision of the Examining Division refusing its application.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:1. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
It wants a baseline survey and a "viable analytical laboratory test method" before any more testing goes forward.In the Dec. 1 teleconference, Hodges cited "enormous knowledge gaps that exist" and said there is a "lack of a solid foundation" for the new policy, which it does not think is necessary. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 4:26 am by Leslie Sammis
It is not a violation of the state’s criminal laws for 44 a physician to: 45 (1)? [read post]