Search for: "Eddings v. White" Results 1461 - 1480 of 1,661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 3:19 pm by Armand Grinstajn
White, the ED has discussed the three new requests filed with letter of Nov.5. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:54 am by Marvin Ammori
As a senior White House official said: "If it bothers you that the China government does it, it should bother you when your cable company does it. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 10:09 am by David Doniger
  And there’s not likely to be a more favorable Congress and a stronger champion in the White House than we have right now. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
 The rules also specifically state that a judge is not disqualified based solely on campaign speech protected by Republican Part of Minn v White, 536 US 765 (2002), and, in the most controversial amendment, provide for review by the entire Supreme Court if a single justice denies a motion for disqualification. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am by Monica Bay
White Sox addict Ron Stevens made his annual visit, and we got to see two games, from two decidedly different perspectives: the field level and from the aforementioned main 233b. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Part 1 and Part 2 of this series examined the historical context of the debate surrounding dairy product food safety, and the mechanisms by which pasteurized or raw dairy products may become contaminated with foodborne pathogens. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Wigmore, Evidence 2511 (3d ed. 1940). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal… [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:03 pm
Ed. note: Have a question for next week? [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:15 am
  Specifically, Ed and Andrew, who both work in Dorsey’s Trial Department and who participate in our White Collar Crime Practice Group, examine the potential criminal and civil penalties that a company faces when one of its employees engages in criminal behavior. [read post]