Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 15,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2011, 9:24 am
(Eugene Volokh) From Grewal v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:44 am
Or la borne minimale "0,330" ne figure pas dans la demande de priorité D1. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 1:29 pm
On the upside -- at least for residents of San Diego -- the County of San Diego wins in the Court of Appeal, which means several more million dollars per year in taxes from the owners of the mall.So I figure all we gotta do is win another thousand or so of these cases and, poof, San Diego's budget problems will be solved. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:30 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
Butts, the “actual malice” requirement was extended to apply to “public figures” outside government, and then in 1974 case Gertz v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 2:17 am
This week's case, Hughes v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:11 pm
The first opinion, Pellegrino v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
v=uo35O1AJOfg [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
Nicosia v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:25 pm
Meyer Intellectual Properties Limited v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 1:55 pm
Matos v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
There are countless psycho-social studies and surveys aimed at figuring out “why” spouses engage in adulterous activity. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
There are countless psycho-social studies and surveys aimed at figuring out “why” spouses engage in adulterous activity. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
A public judgment was given at the time in anonymised form (MNB v News Group Newspapers [2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:53 am
So easy that you only have to read the first sentence of the opinion to know not only the question presented, but also its unstated -- but crystal clear -- resolution by the court.So, for example, when the first paragraph of the opinion contains a single sentence, and that sentence reads: "We must decide whether evidence obtained from an authorized wiretap investigation must be suppressed where the government continued to intercept a named target's conversations despite his adoption of a… [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:52 pm
So relatively slim pickings.Still, I thought that today's (sole) opinion helped prove the point that you can sometimes figure out the way a case will come out merely by seeing the manner in which the opinion frames the facts.For example, here, the first paragraph of the opinion seemed fairly pro-plaintiff, or at least not anti-her. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:51 pm
Parish, channeling Peter Kolchin, provides an economical summary: In round figures, there were two whites to every black in the antebellum South; in Russia in 1858, there was one male nobleman to every fifty-two male peasants. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
" Troester v. [read post]
