Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 1461 - 1480 of 37,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2017, 8:55 am by Joy Waltemath
Boeing Co. did not waive attorney-client privilege by holding group deposition preparation meetings between company counsel and current employees and a former employee, a federal district court in Washington has ruled, denying an employee’s motion to compel discovery (Pallies v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:05 am by Deepak Gupta
by Deepak Gupta The amicus briefs supporting our side in AT&T v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 5:15 pm by Howard Bashman
“‘Decisive moment’: Abortion rights groups appeal to Supreme Court to uphold Roe amid Texas ban fallout. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:45 pm by Ilya Somin
Stephen Breyer, who voted to strike down an affirmative action plan in Gratz v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here again is the Introduction from the cert. petition: The Second Circuit's opinion below gives state officials free rein to financially blacklist their political opponents—from gun-rights groups, to abortion-rights groups, to environmentalist groups, and beyond. [read post]
18 May 2023, 12:50 pm
Jaguars -- the animal, not the vehicle -- used to be in the United States, but we killed them all. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
  The Patels formed PL Hotel Group, LLC (PL) to hold title and listed the property for sale. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:56 am by Danny Jacobs
Supreme Court’s ruling in Snyder v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:12 pm
The legislative intent was to reject court interpretation of state law regarding the application of CPRA to auxiliary organizations, in particular CSU Fresno Association, at issue in California State University, Fresno Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:26 pm by H. Scott Leviant
Practice Guide: Landlord-Tenant (The Rutter Group 2012) § 3:39, p. 3-13, citing Green v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:21 am by Lyle Denniston
  The states were required to yield to national supremacy (reinforced by Article V’s Supremacy Clause). [read post]