Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 3,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2007, 8:11 am
Paul, Minnesota, ruled in Phelps-Roper v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:02 pm
Van Hollen decided he could not represent the state in Appling v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:20 am
As we’ve previously mentioned, the Supreme Court has set oral argument in Perry v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:06 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:41 pm
Julius Richmond, a distinguished health care professional who served as Surgeon General of the United States during the Carter Administration. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Calabresi, Gay Marriage and the Fourteenth Amendment, Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 14-51 (October 13, 2014).Maria Linda Ontiveros, The Fundamental Nature of Title VII, (Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 76, 2014).Linda C. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 7:16 am
The jury ruled in plaintiff's favor on the contract theory but rejected his federal and state discrimination claims. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:08 am
Also unique to the California case is that it is a class action law suit.Utah was the first state to have their state law ban on same-sex marriage struck down by a federal court. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
He was dissenting in Romer v Evans, a dissent many LGBT-equality advocates found bristling with antipathy for gay people (see Proposition 3).Proposition 2 is more interesting. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
A. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Beshear 14-574Issue: (1) Whether a state violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment by prohibiting gay men and lesbians from marrying an individual of the same sex; and (2) whether a state violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment by refusing to recognize legal marriages between individuals of the same sex performed in other jurisdictions. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:17 pm
Attorney General Schuette is correct to seek en banc review rather than intermediate appellate review from a 3-judge panel; why waste the time and resources.There is no doubt that this case, along with select others from across the nation, will be ultimately decided by the SCOTUS, as in the United States v Windsor. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
On 13 October 2023, Mr Justice Julian Knowles handed down judgement in Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB). [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 11:53 am
El gobernador Ricardo Rosselló Nevares anunció nuevas designaciones al Consejo Asesor en asuntos relacionados a la comunidad lesbiana, gay, bisexual, transexual y transgénero (LGBTT), creado por la Orden Ejecutiva 2017-037. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:53 pm
” The Supreme Court’s Recent Opinion The Court’s opinion in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 8:02 am
Wednesday morning I attended oral arguments at the United States Supreme Court for United States v. [read post]
