Search for: "HARRIS v. STATE"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 5,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
ZB, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION D/B/A AMEGY BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-56775 O P I N I O N Opinion filed May 7, 2019 On Appeal from the 55th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2017-56775. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:31 am
In Verdugo v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:51 am
In Harris v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
Harris, 133 S.Ct. 1050 (2013) (quoting Texas v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 10:00 am
Harris 19-466Issues: (1) Whether in Scott v. [read post]
7 Mar 2025, 3:30 am
Supreme Court, in upholding the Hyde Amendment in Harris v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
In Enriquez v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:07 am
That decision, Harris v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:27 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 8:41 am
EEOC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Endogenous Legal Traditions and Economic Outcomes Posted by Carmine Guerriero, University of Amsterdam, on Friday, April 22, 2016 Tags: Diversity, Efficiency, Financial Regulation, Globalization, International governance, Labor markets, Legal systems,Market efficiency, Social policies, Stakeholders Dieckman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:11 am
Co-author Rusty Tucker In Texan Land & Cattle II, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
Harris Associates, argued last month. [read post]
Appellate Division Upholds Dismissal Of Case For Failure To File Trial De Novo Due To Clerical Error
19 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm
On May 21, 2019, the Appellate Division in Cuomo v. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
In Harris v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 8:21 am
That ruling, United States v. [read post]