Search for: "Harder v. Harder"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 4,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2021, 12:06 am
As I recently (tentatively) predicted, on Friday 30 July 2021 Justice Beach in the Federal Court of Australia handed down a judgment giving Australia the dubious honour of becoming the first country in the world to legally recognise a non-human as a valid inventor on a patent application: Thaler v Commissioner of Patents [2021] FCA 879. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
The good will be harder to come by if the bad is hard to avoid. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:21 am
Harder, previously obtained a $140 million verdict for Hulk Hogan against Gawker. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:11 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:04 am
The Court of Appeals says no habeas relief is warranted, and plaintiff remains incarcerated.The case is McCray v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:18 am
These registered rights last a long time and the older they get, the harder it can be to find appropriate prior art. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:47 pm
There’s a caricature of US v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:36 am
., blog proprietor, is breathlessly covering all aspects of USA v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:19 am
Konishi V. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:29 pm
Poland would resist even harder than Ukraine. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:34 pm
Time is moneyDoyle v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:04 pm
We may see a third Apple v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 12:24 pm
Harder, but with its own virtues, is "approval voting," whereby voters are asked to indicate all of the candidates they'd in fact "approve of" with regard to their becoming president. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:42 pm
" Unfortunately, last June, in Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 10:57 am
.; and Kim Kardashian West v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 12:37 pm
In Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 2:20 pm
(Ninth indisposed).United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:28 am
The Court of Appeals therefore rejects the more plaintiff-friendly "motivating factor" calculus that governs cases brought under Title VII.The case is Natofsky v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 12:57 pm
In Defense of Animals v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:37 pm
It's much harder to argue to an appeals court that two juries in a row were unreasonable than to say the same about a single jury.From a strategic point of view, Apple actually scored an even more important victory over Samsung on Monday with an appeals court ruling that the district court had erred in denying Apple a permanent injunction against infringing Samsung products, giving Apple a new opportunity to obtain an injunction on remand to the district court.Here's the verdict form (this… [read post]
