Search for: "Harris v. Hand"
Results 1461 - 1480
of 1,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2007, 9:06 pm
Although the word "radical" came up only in a quote only of Harris about the new rules on continuing applications ("The new rules are radical," which rules are currently enjoined by a district court), Kinsella extrapolated in noting: Naturally, the organized patent bar and intellectual property (IP) advocates have an interest in labeling recent developments "radical" so that any really radical proposals will be dismissed out of hand. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Schmidlin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
Springfield, IL 62704 Phone: (217) 782-9696 (V/TTY) Fax: (217) 524-5339 Web: http://www.state.il.usagency/ipcdd Down Syndrome Down Syndrome Development Counsel P.O. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 11:40 pm
The Mississippi case, which involved the fatal beating of a 56-year-old woman who had just been at church choir practice, was the third such stay since the justices decided in September to consider the Kentucky case, Baze v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:26 pm
The latest Harry Potter copyright case is there too. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:41 am
In Hutto v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
See, e.g., Harris v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:32 pm
On the other hand, Prof. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1-1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
"David Souter was shattered" (page 177), so Bush v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 2:35 pm
"We conclude that there does exist a sufficient link," noting that in Loving v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Harris County Bail Bond Bd., No. 05-20714 A decision finding that a Texas statute restricting solicitation of potential customers denied bail bondsmen their First Amendment rights is affirmed in part and reversed in part where all but one of the restrictions violated the bondsmen's right to commercial speech. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court's 2002 ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 9:01 pm
Harris, 401 U.S. (1971). [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:47 am
Harris, 127 S. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 12:35 pm
Williams in the opinion issued July 27 in Gammett v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 4:28 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 4:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:28 pm
Supreme Court handed down Zelman v Harris-Simmons which held that Ohio's Cleveland-based voucher program was constitutional. [read post]
